<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E &#187; PROCESS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabarish.com/category/process/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabarish.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Future of Software Development</title>
		<link>http://www.sabarish.com/the-future-of-software-development-18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabarish.com/the-future-of-software-development-18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabarish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DEVELOPMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROCESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROGRAMMING]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOFTWARE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabarish.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Software development has come a full circle states Alex Iskold in a scathing, pull-no-punches broadside upon the Waterfall model.
Read it here: the future of software development
Alex states that arrogance was the main problem with the waterfall model. The arrogance he argues came from the fact that we believed that we could always engineer the perfect [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabarish.com/the-future-of-software-development-18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iterative vs. waterfall software development</title>
		<link>http://www.sabarish.com/iterative-vs-waterfall-software-development-8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabarish.com/iterative-vs-waterfall-software-development-8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabarish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DEVELOPMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROCESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REQUIREMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabarish.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nowadays, this question seems to figure at every technical interview that that I been involved with (at either side of the table). What would you choose &#8211; Waterfall model or the Iterative approach?
The correct answer &#8211; it depends.
The usual answer &#8211; some mumbling about extreme programming (followed barely disguised rant on how one was forced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabarish.com/iterative-vs-waterfall-software-development-8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.sabarish.com/managing-requirements-7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabarish.com/managing-requirements-7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabarish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BPMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS PROCESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROCESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REQUIREMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabarish.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FACT #1: The Standish Group’s 1994 Chaos Report found that the top three project impairment factors across 352 companies and 8,000 projects were

Lack of user input (12.8% of respondents),
Incomplete requirements and specifications (12.3%), and
Changing requirements and specifications (11.8%)

FACT #2: Almost 50% of defects identified during testing to be due to defects in requirements. Source: “Calculating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabarish.com/managing-requirements-7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
