<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>E &#187; REQUIREMENTS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabarish.com/category/requirements/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabarish.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Requirements Analysis Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.sabarish.com/requirements-analysis-problems-21.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabarish.com/requirements-analysis-problems-21.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabarish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DEVELOPMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REQUIREMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabarish.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an earlier post I&#8217;d lamented about the problems in managing requirements, this post probably reads as a prequel to that one. What are the real problems when it comes to requirements analysis?
Meryl K. Evans of the lockergnome identifies 5 specific issues:

Customers Don’t Know What They Want
Requirements Change During the Project
Timeline Trouble
Communication Gaps
Customer Organization Politics

True, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabarish.com/requirements-analysis-problems-21.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iterative vs. waterfall software development</title>
		<link>http://www.sabarish.com/iterative-vs-waterfall-software-development-8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabarish.com/iterative-vs-waterfall-software-development-8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabarish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DEVELOPMENT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROCESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REQUIREMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabarish.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nowadays, this question seems to figure at every technical interview that that I been involved with (at either side of the table). What would you choose &#8211; Waterfall model or the Iterative approach?
The correct answer &#8211; it depends.
The usual answer &#8211; some mumbling about extreme programming (followed barely disguised rant on how one was forced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabarish.com/iterative-vs-waterfall-software-development-8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Managing Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.sabarish.com/managing-requirements-7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.sabarish.com/managing-requirements-7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sabarish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BPMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BUSINESS PROCESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PROCESS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REQUIREMENTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabarish.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FACT #1: The Standish Group’s 1994 Chaos Report found that the top three project impairment factors across 352 companies and 8,000 projects were

Lack of user input (12.8% of respondents),
Incomplete requirements and specifications (12.3%), and
Changing requirements and specifications (11.8%)

FACT #2: Almost 50% of defects identified during testing to be due to defects in requirements. Source: “Calculating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sabarish.com/managing-requirements-7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
